Zuku

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
makeste

“De – Izuku!”

makeste

anyway so here’s my BakuDeku essay from all the way back in chapter 327 lols.

so back when The Apology Chapter came out, I mentioned that I had mixed feelings about Katsuki calling Izuku by his actual name. here’s a quick breakdown of my concerns.

  • I am deeply invested in both Katsuki’s character arc and the entire BakuDeku relationship trainwreck.
  • owing to the above, questions like “do these two actually respect and trust each other?”, and more specifically, “does Bakugou actually respect Deku?” are really important to me, and I would dearly like to believe that the answer is “yes.” on a similar note, I would also really like the answer to “is Bakugou really as much of an asshole as he makes himself out to be?” to be “no.”
  • however, if these things really are true – that Bakugou’s genuine asshole days are behind him, and he really does trust and respect Deku – then at some point the follow-up question needs to be asked, “why does Bakugou keep calling Deku by a cruel and insulting nickname?
  • and again, if we assume that Trust and Respect and Not-An-Asshole are all in fact true, then the only acceptable answer to that question would be, “because he doesn’t actually think of it as an insult, anymore.

which makes sense, actually! because Kacchan has unflattering nicknames for just about every person he interacts with. Shitty Hair, Half and Half, Dunce Face, Ears, Ponytail, even Hag and Old Man. it’s just his thing, and we all know he doesn’t mean anything by it. so why should “Deku” be any different? it’s just him doing the same thing he always does. hell, if anything, he put a lot more creativity and effort into “Deku” than he does with most of his nicknames lol.

so yeah, not only do I have a vested interest in Kacchan using “Deku (affectionate)” rather than “Deku (derogatory)”, I think it’s supported by canon as well. but here’s the problem, though. if “Deku” isn’t an insult, then the symbolic gesture of switching from “Deku” to “Izuku” is basically meaningless. or at least it should be meaningless. because basically all you’re doing is switching from a nickname to the person’s actual name. the only way it would actually have meaning is if it truly was an insult after all. because in that case, then it’s obviously a huge fucking deal. it’s powerful af, and shows how seriously Katsuki is committed to becoming a better person and doing right by Izuku. which is good stuff, actually.

but anyway, so that’s my dilemma. on the one hand, “either Katsuki didn’t respect Deku, or else he was still being a straight up dick to him all the way up until chapter 322” is a thought that takes a lot of the wind out of my sails, and retroactively makes a lot of my favorite moments in the series much less appealing. but on the other hand, that scene in chapter 322 truly was excellent, and the emotional impact of him switching to “Izuku” at such a crucial moment was a big part of that, ngl. anyway, so I’ve been kind of torn on the whole thing.

until 327, that is.


Keep reading

eri-cheri

Yes! Yes! Fully agree but, forgive me, I also have to add THIS!!!

image


Deku changed “Deku” to the meaning that Ochaco placed on it, the Deku who does his best. But the Deku who does his best, no matter what happens to him CLEARLY became a toxic mindset that hurt him! So stripping Deku entirely of “the Deku who does his best” and the “useless Deku” and calling him “Izuku” instead humanizes him and helps him see himself as the person he always was as long as Bakugo has known him! Izuku, the child who held his hand out at the river! A true hero at heart! Izuku, who should really maybe realize that he himself matters!!!

I would add this panel but the official translation fucked it up, I find it curious how when All Might fails to reach Izuku, he thinks to himself “I wanted to tell you, you DONT HAVE to do your best”. Which again, no offense to Ochaco, goes back to how Deku internalized the name to something that clearly was damaging. So for Katsuki to call him “Izuku” instead, is very meaningful and also like a way to take off the burden of the “hero” Deku. And place value in the “human” Izuku.

makeste

@eri-cheri it’s amazing how many different layers of meaning there are to Deku’s name. to me though, his decision to reclaim it, and make it such a huge part of his identity, was the opposite of him devaluing himself. that was one of the few times he’s really put himself out there and made a statement about who he wants to be. changing the meaning from “useless” to “you can do it.” and I think it’s the perfect blend of his “win” and “save” sides, because it’s obviously a very humble-sounding name with very modest origins – but to him, it’s a reminder that he can get it done. something that he draws inspiration from, especially in those moments when he starts to doubt himself.

if anything, he draws so much inspiration and strength from that identity that he was able to cloak himself in it entirely during the Dekuangst arc. it basically became a crutch, not a burden. the Hero Deku was someone who could tirelessly carry on even when he, the boy Izuku, was exhausted and scared and lonely. but the problem was that it was ultimately just a farce. he was trying to create a separation where there wasn’t one. Deku and Izuku aren’t two separate identities; Izuku is Deku, and Deku is him. and he was trying to run away from all of his trauma and his fears, but in reality they never went anywhere, and the whole thing was just a burning powder keg waiting to explode.

anyway, but thanks to his friends who took great pains to remind him that it’s okay for heroes to be human too, he seems to be working his way through all of that now at long last. which means we’ll hopefully soon see the return of the original Hero Deku, who has always been just as strong and determined and tough, but who also allowed himself to be vulnerable around others, and took that vulnerability and turned it into empathy, which has always been his greatest weapon.

anyway so this was very rambly, but basically my point is that “hero” and “human” Deku/Izuku are one and the same. and I think it’s fine for him to embrace the “Deku who always does his best” thing, honestly! even Kacchan said there was nothing wrong with it. the problem was just that he tried to do it all alone, which was always going to be impossible, because he was one of the people that needed to be saved. because sometimes heroes need saving too.

hungryallday
grandtheftflora:
“haltmann:
“widowgaycer:
“ exigetspersonal:
“
Okay but if I’m gonna reblog this I need to tell you guys the story of this legendary pachirisu
So in the competitive Pokemon scene, there’s what’s called a ‘metagame’, which is what’s...
exigetspersonal


Okay but if I’m gonna reblog this I need to tell you guys the story of this legendary pachirisu

So in the competitive Pokemon scene, there’s what’s called a ‘metagame’, which is what’s generally used and what is/isn’t allowed in competitive battling. Certain pokemon are banned from the ‘meta’ because of being too powerful. Others aren’t generally used because there are better alternatives, or they’re simply too weak. People base their entire strategies around the expectation that they’ll be facing certain pokemon, and attempt to counter them with certain pokemon.

But the problem with this meta is, during the 2014 World Championships, there were a small number of pokemon choices that everybody had. Gardevoir, Kangeskhan, Salamence, Tyranitar, Talonflame, Garchomp… the same pokemon coming up again and again. Things weren’t really all that interesting.

And then came the Double Battle World Championship. And this guy.

image

Park Se Jun. One of the best players in the world. He used a Pachirisu with Nuzzle (a move with 100% paralysis chance), Super Fang (cuts target’s HP in half) and Follow Me (a move that redirects attacks AWAY from allied pokemon), and equipped with a recently-buffed Sitrus Berry. And he turned the metagame on its head, because nobody in the championships had prepared for anything outside their incredibly restrictive expectations.

Their strategies and planning were completely tripped up by an electric squirrel. Battling his Pachirisu in incredibly tight synergy with the rest of his team, Park Se Jun swept the finals and became World Champion of 2014 Doubles.

image

And that is the story of the #BASED GOD PACHIRISU.

widowgaycer

To give more details on Pachirisu and this Pachirisu in particular:

  • Pachirisu’s stats aren’t great. They aren’t terrible, but they aren’t great. Of the four Pokemon involved in this particular exchange, Salamence and Garchomp have a base stat total of 600, Mega Tyranitar has 700, and Pachirisu has 405. Yeah.
  • To make things worse, Pachirisu is a gimmick Pokemon of a class known as a “Pikachu clone”. Its entire purpose is to be a generic Electric-type with middling stats and chubby cheeks. It was never built for high-level play, and a lot of people will even say that it’s not worth it for casual because there are so many better Electric-types.
  • Pachirisu does have a couple of things going for it, though. Firstly, its Special Defence and Speed stats aren’t totally garbage, and its Defence isn’t bad either. This means that it can take a hit if you train it right (which Se Jun did).
  • Secondly, the moveset that this particular Pachirisu had was a brilliant one for what Se Jun wanted it to do. Nuzzle deals a tiny amount of damage but is guaranteed to paralyse anything that isn’t an Electric- or Ground-type. Paralysis halves speed and gives you a 50/50 chance of not being able to do anything that turn. That’s HUGE. This is a game in which most major attackers are fast as hell, and outspeeding is vital to pretty much all strategies.
  • Super Fang, as mentioned, is guaranteed to do 50% damage to anything that’s not a Ghost-type. Pachirisu cannot explicitly KO with this, but what it can do is break down its opponents’ defences. You can’t use inventory items in competitive play, so it’s unlikely that this damage will be healed, and 50% damage can make the difference between Pachirisu’s partner taking two moves to defeat its opponent vs taking one move.
  • Follow Me redirects opponents’ moves onto Pachirisu if they would have otherwise hit Pachirisu’s partner. This lead to the instance above, in which Pachirisu survived a hit from a Draco Meteor (a 130 power attack in a game where 90 power is considered excellent and 100 power or above generally requires major drawbacks). You might think “but if it couldn’t take out Pachirisu, then it couldn’t take out the Salamence it was meant for, right?” NOPE: Salamence is weak to Dragon-type attacks like Draco Meteor and so would have taken double damage. That’s probably a KO.
  • But the real purpose of Follow Me was for Pachirisu’s intended partner: Gyarados. Depending on the situation, Gyarados takes either double or quadruple damage from Electric-type attacks, which is a shame because Gyarados is otherwise terrifying. Pachirisu has the passive ability Volt Absorb, which means that it’s healed by Electric-type attacks rather than taking damage from them. So if you try to use an Electric-type attack on that Gyarados there’s a very good chance that you will end up healing Pachirisu instead. Not what you want, especially when this particular Pachirisu is so unbelievably bulky.
  • Oh, and its last move is Protect, which totally nullifies damage on Pachirisu for that turn. Useful if Pachirisu can’t do anything useful this turn but you don’t want to swap it out.
  • And that Sitrus Berry? Yeah, that thing recovers 25% of Pachirisu’s total HP the moment it goes below 30% total. So if you just barely fail to kill Pachirisu, it’s going to heal itself. Have fun.
  • The last thing Pachirisu has going for it, at least in this case, is intimidation. The universal response to this team was “Who the fuck brings a fucking Pachirisu to the World Championship?!” But then you realise that Se Jun is totally serious about this ridiculous plan. And then you realise that it’s working. And then you realise: oh shit, this guy is really good. He knows what he’s doing with this.

TL;DR: By all accounts Pachirisu should have been an utterly stupid thing to bring to this level of play, but in practise it was a very clever set-up that took advantage of its decent defensive stats and useful support/survival movepool.

haltmann

Something of note: Park Se Jun has said himself that bringing Craydily instead would have been the better choice, he just REALLY wanted to use Pachirisu.

Legend.

grandtheftflora

This was such a moment in competitive Pokemon history that they gave out a copy of this pachirisu to anyone with Omega Ruby or Alpha Sapphire to commemorate it

image
omorification
amerlcanapparel

when she says she doesn’t send nudes

image
follovved

when guys objectify women and expect them to send nudes

image
timelordpillbug

when someone asks you about your nuclear plans for russia

image
hikingnerd

When Russia sends you nudes

image
whereismystrawberrytart

image
dismantlerepaired

image
my-fandom-life

image
thegingerbalrog

image
onwardwall

image
miss-jaxon-flaxon-waxon

#what the fuck happened here

becketts-one-and-done

This is my favorite post in all of tumblr

onfirelikegasoline

reminder that this post is now illegal in Russia

tree-of-blue-squirrel

reblog it, because Russia can´t

maradaisykat

Thanks Obama 

my-sisters-eyeball

Wtf

roomba-with-knives-taped-to-it

When Russia makes this post illegal

image
earthnicity

I HAVE ONLY SEEN THIS IN SCREENSHOTS

dovahdez

I will reblog this every goddamn time I find it on my dash

fanvergentinanexistentialcrisis

I have found a Legendary Post

doe--lita

ITS HERE

dentistchicken-old-deactivated2
steampunktendencies

A remarkable Jacobean re-emergence after 200 years of yellowing varnish
Courtesy Philip Mould

beyoursledgehammer

PAINT RESTORATION OF MESMERIZING

eliciaforever

I saw this on Twitter. He’s using acetone, but a cellulose ether has been added to make it into a gel (probably Klucel—this entire gel mixture is sometimes just called Klucel by restorers, but Klucel is specifically the stuff that makes the gel). 

Normally, acetone is too volatile for restoration, but when it’s a gel, it becomes very stable and a) stays on top of the porous surface of the painting, and b) won’t evaporate. So it can eat up the varnish.

It looks scary, but acetone has no effect on oils, and jelly acetone is even less interactive with the surface of the paint or canvas.

soggy-bunny

Will someone PLEASE clean the mona lisa

dracofidus

For those who are wondering, they cleaned a copy of the Mona Lisa made by one of Da Vinchi’s students, and here’s a side by side comparison:

image

CLEAN THE FUCKING MONA LISA.

eleanorputyourbootsbackon

A couple problems with cleaning the Mona Lisa:

The Mona Lisa is a glazed painting.

A Direct Painting is one in which the artist mixes a large amount of paint of the correct value and shade the first time, and applies it to the painting. A Glazed Painting is a painting in which an underpainting is painted, generally in shades of gray or brown, and a allowed to dry, before layers of very thin glaze - a mixture of a tiny bit of pigment and a lot of oil - is applied to the surface.  Some artists, such as Leonardo, choose to work this way because it provides an incredible sense of light and illumination (look at how the real Mona Lisa seems to glow).

The Mona Lisa is an incredible work of glazed painting, but that makes it fragile, so fragile that many conservators don’t want to work on it because it’s extremely difficult and a conservation effort go wrong for many many reasons. One of the reasons it could go wrong is that the glazes and the varnish layers are actually a very similar chemical composition, and a conservator could accidentally strip off layers of glaze while removing the varnish. 

In fact, in 1809 during its first restoration when they stripped off the varnish, they also stripped off some of the top paint layers, which has caused the painting to look more washed out than Leonardo painted it. 

The Mona Lisa also has a frankly ridiculous amount of glaze layers on it, as Leonardo considered it incomplete up until he died, He actually took it with him when he left Italy (fleeing charges of homosexuality), meaning it never even got to the family who had commissioned it, and instead constantly altered it, trying to get it just a touch more perfect every time. That makes it really fragile, with countless layers of very thin paint, many of which have cracked, warped, flaked, or discolored. It’s not just the top layer, its layers and layers of glazing throughout the painting that have slowly discolored or been damaged over time.

Speaking of damage, look at the cracking. That’s called craquelure; it happens with many painting’s (even ones that aren’t painted with this technique) because the paint shrinks as it dries, or the surface it’s painted on warps.  Notice that the other painting has very little of it, even though it’s almost the same age.

The reason the Mona Lisa has so much craquelure is because Leonardo was highly experimental, almost to the point of it being his biggest flaw. There were established painting techniques, and then there were Leonardo’s painting techniques.  The established painting techniques were created in order to insure longevity and quality, but Leonardo didn’t stick to any of them. This has made his work a ticking time bomb of deterioration. 

Don’t believe me, check it out:

This is how most people think The Last Supper looks

image

But this is actually a copy done by Andrea Solari in 1520.

The actual Last Supper looks like this:

image

The Last Supper has been painstakingly and teadiously restored, with conservators sometimes working on sections as small as 4 cm a day. To get to it you’ve got to walk through a series of airlocks (AIRLOCKS!?!?!) and they only allow 15 people at a time because the moisture from your breath and your skin particles will damage it. Despite all of the precautions and restoration, it still looks like that.

This is because Leonardo painted the last supper using highly experimental methods. He didn’t use the traditional wet-into-wet method that fresco painters used, and insead painted onto the dry plaster on the wall, meaning the paint did not chemically adhere.  Before he even died the painting had already begun to flake. It’s a miracle it’s still there at all.

They’ve done what restoration they can on The Last Supper because the painting will absolutely disappear if they don’t. The Mona Lisa, which is delicate, but much more stable, doesn’t need the same kind of attention. And, like many of his works, is just too delicate to touch, and the risk of doing irreparable damage to it is far too high. The Mona Lisa is insured for something like 800 million dollars, and that’s a lot of money to be ruined by one wrong brush stroke. (fun fact: the most expensive painting ever sold was also a Leonardo, the Salvator Mundi, and it went for 450 million dollars.)

Furthermore, there are probably only 20 or so authenticated Leonardo paintings in the whole world. If you look through the list, most of them aren’t even fully done by him, are disputed, or aren’t even finished.  It’s simply too difficult and too risky to restore the Mona Lisa, one of Leonardo’s only finished and mostly intact works, when there’s hardly any more of his paintings to fall back on.

Now the painting you see in the video above is 200 years old, not 600 years old, and I assure you, the conservators decided the risk to restore it was minimal (after extensive research, paint testing, x-raying, gamma radiation, etc.) and that the work they were doing was worth the risk based on the painting’s value.

Conservators make the decision all the time about how much they can do for a painting, because really, they have the ability to completely strip a painting of all varnish and glazes and just repaint the whole thing (which happens to a lot of badly damaged paintings, especially when there’s no way to save them - one of the very small museums in my area recently deaccessioned a Monet because it was barely original, and no one wants to look at a Monet that’s only 20% Monet’s work) - but doing that to the Mona Lisa, removing the artist’s hand from the most famous piece of artwork in history? Hell No.

(also, I’m not a conservator but I’ll be applying to a conservation grad program sometime next year, so sorry if any of my info is at all inaccurate) 

tabby-dragon

I found this really interesting, thanks for sharing.